Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Camera: Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera with APS-C, Auto Focus & 4K Video – ILCE 6300 Body with 3” LCD Screen – E Mount Compatible – Black (Includes Body Only)
$944.95






Price: $944.95
(as of Jan 14, 2025 08:34:48 UTC – Details)
World’s fastest autofocus speed and most extensive autofocus coverage plus newly developed 24.2 MP APS-C Sensor, high resolution 4K video recording and more. Do not handle damaged or leaking lithium ion batteries
Faster Autofocus: Shoot up to 11fps with 425 phase detection auto focus points and 0.05 sec AF speed
Incredible Photography: Advanced 24.2 MP Exmore CMOS sensor expands sensitivity and minimizes noise
Electronic Viewfinder: Cameras feature a high resolution XGA OLED Tru-Finder for enhanced viewing
4K & HD Recording: Record professional content with multiple movie functions and full pixel readout
Compact & Durable: Dust and moisture seals protect the magnesium alloy body from harsh conditions
Customers say
Customers are satisfied with the camera’s image quality, focusing speed, and value. They praise its stunning 4K video quality, fast AF, and 11fps continuous shooting mode. Many find it well worth the money, with its superb autofocus in video mode and phase detection autofocus feature. They also appreciate its low-light capabilities, size, and functionality. However, some customers have reported issues with overheating when recording at 4K in moderate temperatures.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
7 reviews for Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Camera: Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera with APS-C, Auto Focus & 4K Video – ILCE 6300 Body with 3” LCD Screen – E Mount Compatible – Black (Includes Body Only)
Add a review
$944.95
D. Pierce –
An Alpha evolution (Updated)
Retiring my DSLR and moving to the Sony mirrorless system has been the most liberating event in my decades of photography since digital and autofocus before that. Same (now better) quality and performance with half the weight. Traveller’s dream! I currently shoot with an A6000 with a NEX-3C as a backup/second body in the travel kit. Many comments are based on comparing the A6300 to its older sibling.So. Here I sit looking at my recently arrived Sony A6300. At first glance, itâs nearly indistinguishable from the A6000 sitting next to it. At second glance, the slightly textured finish of the magnesium alloy body and the return of the AF/MF switch just under the mode dial do supply some visual cues. Looking at the top plate seals it since there is a distinct A63000 label. So, if it is virtually the same camera, why did I buy it?Turning it on, spending 20-30 minutes in the menu and playing with autofocus provided at least half of the answer. This is not a technical leap like the A6000 was when it first appeared but it has solid improvements that based on personal needs or preferences, may or may not justify the $400 difference between it and the still-available A6000. The justification depends a lot on how and what you shoot. If you use your camera for video at all, it could be a done deal since the improvements in that department make it one of the most capable part-time video cameras in its price range. If not, your decision may be a bit more difficult. Not because the A6300 is in any way lame, but because the A6000 is still to be considered a fantastic camera.After a few days, Iâve compiled a list of the changes (so far) that justify my choice for getting an A6300 and moving the A6000 to the second body position in my travel kit.Two small things right off the bat:”USB Power Supply = On” Allows the use of a USB battery pack to extend battery life almost indefinitely. It allows the camera to operate while charging and with a 15,000 MAH device charger pack connected, it should power the camera for hours.”Release w/o Card = Disable” No more puttering around in the garden snapping random flowers only to find the card was left in the reader when inspiration hit.The significant things:1. Focus : Autofocus is incredible. 425 phase-detect focus points on the sensor cover most of the frame and allow for vastly improved focus tracking. Face recognition is fast and accurate. Improved eye-AF tracks focus on a subjectâs eyes so the face is always in focus. Huge value for weddings and such. Did I mention fast? The A6000 and the 55-210 kit lens wan’t bad for outdoor action shooting but the A6300 makes me want to pop for the 70-200 f/4 and go find some flying birds or something. One feature I hadnât heard mentioned but stumbled across in the menu was âAF In Focus Mag.â It allows you to magnify the focus point while in DMF mode as you would in manual focus and a half-press on the shutter activates autofocus while remaining zoomed, allowing for a critical focus check. Another pleasant surprise is that the on-sensor phase-detect is now available to lenses like my A-mount 16-50 f/2.8 SSM via the LA-EA3 adapter. Focus speed seems little different, if at all, from native lenses. AF-A is disabled, as is DMF and the specific MF setting but manual focus is always available.2. Viewfinder: The A6300 has nearly double the number of pixels as the one in the A6000 and while the difference is noticeable, it isnât an oh-my-God difference. What is very noticeable is the 120hz refresh on the viewfinder which eliminates image tearing and lag. Iâm also happy to see the return of the electronic level as a viewfinder and LCD overlay. Unlike its predecessors that display the last image shot in a rapid (but lagging) slide show during burst shooting, the A6300 offers a real-time live viewfinder display at 8 frames per second with full auto-exposure and focus tracking that makes action shooting much easier. It really brings EVF tech one step closer to eliminating the need for any optical component to the viewfinder beyond letting light in through the lens.3. Silent Shutter Mode: It is truly silent. Its potential for use in a solemn situations like wedding ceremonies is pretty awesome. I did some research on the tech behind it and found an interesting article related to the A7x series cameras that warn of the time it takes to read out the image once the electronic second shutter is triggered. If panning aggressively or if a subject were to move suddenly an effect similar to the âjell-o legsâ in CMOS video may manifest. Concerned, I went out and did some testing and found that though setting the shutter to silent limits burst shooting to âLowâ, even aggressive panning didnât distort vertical lines in any of the situations I tried. My guess is that the electronic second curtain terminates the exposure very quickly and the 1/20 sec. or so for readout and reset for a single frame, while taking a little extra time, is done after the exposure is recorded and the distortion doesnât come into play as it does in video.4. Build: Not a tank but definitely, at least, an IED-resistant Humvee. Reminiscent of the NEX-7, actually. The magnesium alloy feels solid (but so does the A6000âs polycarbonate) and its pebbled texture feels âcomfortableâ. The grip now has a slight indentation at the bottom on the lens side right where your middle and ring fingers rest. The indentation on the grip sharpens the ridge a bit and makes it slightly easier for my medium-sized hand to hold (IMHO). The body is 4mm thicker front to back than the A6000 and along with the extra 2 ounces of heft makes the camera feel a little more substantial but unless you have a body in each hand, the additional weight isnât really noticeable. Except for the aforementioned AF/MF switch, the controls are identical. The added weather sealing just ices the cake.5. Sensor: Another evolutionary rather than revolutionary list of improvements. The shallower photosites made possible by using copper rather than aluminum in the sensor circuitry improve compatibility with wide-angle lenses (theoretically) as well as light gathering. 10x better in low light than the A6000? Sadly, no. However, the changes in the sensor and processor have made about a one-stop improvement IMHO. I can set the auto-ISO to 6400 now with little to fear where the A6000’s ISO6400 shots were hit and miss as far as usability. Copper wire is a better conductor than aluminum which may contribute to the significantly faster readout that enables 120fps in 1080p recording. The big thing is the phase-detect autofocus array and associated image analysis for tracking and overall speed. There is still hunting in low-contrast, dim environments but the ability to find and lock focus is much improved. Of all the improvements, this could be the One Big Thing when looking for a reason to choose the A6300 over its older sibling.6. Customization: The buttons and Fn menu can now be customized to host almost any shooting or playback function. After I finished fiddling with button customization I have settled on Focus Assist for C1 by the shutter release and Silent Shutter for C2 on the back. I then turned to the Fn menu and found that the Drive, ISO and Exposure Compensation access on the four-way nav had redundant entries in the grid as did the top-dial-adjustable Shooting Mode. I replaced them with a few items left out in button customization that I would I still have to dig in the main menu to get to. Now Auto ISO Minimum Shutter Speed (another neat new feature), Face/Smile Detect, Image Quality and Finder Refresh Rate are easily accessed.***Update*** Not sure how I missed the Fn settings feature in the A6000 menu but now I have set my A6000 to match the A6300. Live and learn! (And RTFM!)7. Video: Except for occasional short clips of no more than 5 minutes, I don’t do video. If I did and wanted to shoot important video of a wedding or something, I’d buy an actual video camera that doesn’t legally have to legally terminate shooting at 29 minutes and 59 seconds to avoid import taxes. The A6300 is a stills camera with remarkable video capability, not a dedicated video camera. I may play with some of the video features simply because they are there but I bought this camera for the solid still image feature set.I’ve only had the camera for a week so far but my initial impression pretty much confirms the research I did before ordering it. I have taken it out for a spin at Disneyland and despite the poor light and 16-50 kit lens (jacket pocket camera), I came back with some very nice images. So far, it’s a definite keeper for me!I will update if I come across anything new. The 18-105 f/4 G arrived a couple of days ago and I’m eager to see what it can do.***Update – six months in***Since the first review I’ve shot about 10K images and my first good impression has only gotten better. The choice of the 18-105 f/4 G was a good one too. Despite its size, it spends more time on the A6300 than any other lens. The improved live-view and extra stop of clean ISO really came in handy shooting a wedding in June and even though it was about 102° and humid for an outdoor wedding (yeah, I know…), I had no overheating issue for stills or bursts (no video). Eye AF is pretty amazing when trying to keep someone in focus on a dance floor and tracking AF is actually useful now. It doesn’t feel any different from the A6000 until I shoot with the A6000. As good as the A6000 is (and that is quite good), the A6300 is an obvious upgrade if you use both alternately.Bottom line: I feel my money was well spent. I don’t find myself wishing for the next upgrade or feel the need to jump to full-frame right now. The image quality is excellent and being able to carry two cameras and an assortment of lenses in a day pack makes this photographer smile.
Charles G. Haacker –
Hands Down THE Best Camera I Have Ever Owned, Digital or Otherwise
I suspect every camera review I’ve ever written started with, “Is It Wrong to Love a Camera?” Yeah, silly, but it really is that way for me since I got into digital about 12 years ago. I’ve been staging up through various cameras and even brands. I switched from Nikon to Sony when I bought a very gently used RX10 for its 1″ sensor. Love it. Still do. But somewhere along the way I craved a bigger sensor yet, a “half frame” APS-C. I did my usual due diligence and bought an A6000 with the two much-disparaged and unfairly despised so-called “kit” lenses (there is nothing wrong with the lenses, by the way). I was already gaga for the A6000 and as I am nearing the close of my journey I think these cameras are likely as far as I will go, or need to go.As an old pro I therefore wanted a second body. I still shoot occasional assignments and it is simply foolish to bet everything on one camera. They can, do, and will break without warning. I resumed my due diligence (with $$$$ in mind of course, I ain’t made of money) and compared the A6300 and A6500 with the A6000 (and I know there’s an A7000 in the pipeline but enough is enough).I bought the A6300. Considerably less $pendy than the A6500, and except for the touch screen seems to be identical. I not only don’t need a touch screen, I don’t want one. I am a left-eye shooter, and I was lucky to come across a review that warned left-eye shooters that they would have a problem with their *noses* doing undesired things by contacting the screen while shooting. The writer said the only thing he could do was turn it off. Welp, I said, if I have to turn the touch screen off, why would I need or want a touch screen? (Duh) So A6300 it was.The A6300 and A6000 are also very similar, but the reason I didn’t just get another A6000 was the EVF. The finder on the A6300 is twice as bright and sharp. It’s spectacular. It’s like an optical finder only (IMHO) better. I thought the A6000 was good, but this is mind-blowing clarity, and the specs say it’s also faster (i.e., no lag). I frankly never detected any lag on my “antique” RX10 (original model) so I am fine with whatever. I don’t shoot sports or such but I do try to keep up with my 3-year-old granddaughter and she does *everything* at a dead run but I never have the slightest problem, with the camera anyway (I get a little winded but the camera is fine). The one picture I am showing of her was made a couple of weeks ago. Little Miss Irrepressible Perpetual Motion was *jumping* up and down. Made with my Sony A-6300 with my walk-around E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS, Aperture Priority, 1/250 sec. @ Æ/8.0, ISO 5000, no flashBattery life is not outstanding. So? This does not bother me a bit. I carry extra charged batteries plus a charger. It’s a *mirrorless,* people! Mirrorless cameras are energy hogs. They are in live view all the time, screen plus EVF (and I always have both on all the time for convenience). The A series actually use more energy in the EVF, and the A6300 uses even more for its EVF than the A6000 owing to the A6300’s being so much brighter and sharper = less battery life. I think all the advantages of mirrorless easily outweigh having to carry a couple of extra batteries.Folks sometimes as, would I, as a retired pro, shoot a job with this camera. Even, say, a wedding? Absolutely! No hesitation! I am a very committed available light shooter, and I still shoot events for nonprofits. I’ve added a couple of shots on a factory floor and a conference room, all available, even mixed light. If I shot a wedding with an A6300 or even an RX10 I’d carry the flash for emergencies but it would probably stay in the bag. Image quality? At ridiculous ISOs? Sure. Noise is easily mitigated in post, most especially if you shoot raw and I shoot nothing else ever. I do not think you need a full frame to be professional. You need training and technique and the ability to shoot raw and finish it, but are these “prosumer” cameras suited to professional duty? Absolutely. If you glance at the attached pictures you will see the cameras being used in all kinds of light with no issues whatsoever.
Gladys Dilandi –
No he tenido aún problemas de calentamiento o baterÃa, y he grabado un evento que duró casi 3 horas continuas. Por el precio en el mercado es un producto perfecto, sobre todo si se busca calidad profesional.
Jf –
An excellent camera for the price, though not without faults. The rolling shutter while shooting 4k is quite bad, the battery life is pretty short, so make sure to buy extras. Also, the camera gets pretty warm rather fast (although I haven’t had an actual overheating problem yet). The 120fps @ 1080p is a dream, as is Slog2 for having more control over your colors in post and its great in low-light. Its very small but still feels good in your hand. I’m a big fan of the articulating screen (i’m not a vlogger so i don’t care that it doesn’t flip out to the side) and the image quality is very good (photo and video). Another thing to keep in mind, if your a filmmaker, is that this is a very customization-friendly camera; you can build it up with cages, handles for better a better grip, external monitors, external power supply, even headphone jacks and regular sized auxiliary input/output. in the end,its definitely worth it for the money in my opinion.
Steve Leong –
So far quite happy with the a6300. Have been testing most settings the camera and finding the sweet spot on the 18-135mm lens. Looking forward to use it on my Alaskan cruise as my main camera.
Amazon Customer –
This camera is usually compared with the Cannon… humm… seriously, can Cannon and Nikon come up with names that actually sound different? They all sound the same I can’t tell which is which! D500? D5000? D5? 5D? 50D? or is it 500D? Anyway, honestly I have never owned a DSLR my self, I have used a few and seriously, they suck. The biggest problem I have with DSLRs is there is no live view. Yea, people talk about how OVF is “what you see is what you get”, well except it isn’t. You don’t see exposure, you don’t see depth of field, and you don’t see shutter speed. With live view, you actually see all of that. So you don’t have to take the picture and review it to see if you have blown highlights, it’s right there on live view, with zebra! Also you can’t review your images in the OVF, you have to cup your hand around the LCD which just looks stupid.The only other serious comparison with this camera I can think of is the Fujifilm…. man why do these manufacturers have to name different products with the exact same letter and number? Is it X-10 or XT-10 or X-pro? Anyway, it’s their crop sensor mirrorless. It’s really great, and has better kit lenses. Except it’s bigger and more expensive, with basically the same image quality. So I don’t find that very attractive.I don’t know what’s with the complaints with battery life. I took this out on a tour from noon to 9 PM and I came home with 50% battery left. Sure I don’t take that many pictures, I only took about 200 shots, but still, you can basically take 400 shots on one charge, I’ve never taken that many photos in one day, ever. If you are really hard core professional and you need to take 1000 shots a day, guess what? Just get one of those battery packs for smartphones and you’re good to go.The over heating with 4K video however, is true. I never shoot videos that long but I tested it and it did over heat and shut down, after 26 minutes indoors. Obvious it will depend on the enviroment, if you’re in the shade outside on a relatively cool day say 24 degrees with some wind, it should be ok for continuous use. But if you let it sit under the sun on a hot day, it’ll probably shut down within 10 minutes. No issues with just taking photos though.There is no touchscreen like others have pointed out. So the only way to select AF points is to move it with the arrow pad which is obviously incredibly slow. What you can do instead is use single AF and center spot, aim at the thing you want to focus, focus, and then recompose to take the shot.Yes the EVF is very difficult to use if you have to hood on it and wear glasses. You end up being too far away to see the whole picture. But I don’t usually wear glasses so I’m fine with that. I guess you’ll just have to take off your glasses, it has built-in correction for vision problems of course so that won’t be an issue.Image quality is great like others have pointed out. However I have to be honest here, It isn’t radically better than my 5 year old NEX-5N which has a 14mp sensor. The linear increase in resolution isn’t that noticeable, but the larger pixels on the 5N actually makes it slightly brighter and has similar high ISO noise performance. I think if you had a 24MP NEX, this will be a noticeable improvement, but if you had a 14MP NEX camera, raw image quality wise, it’ll be more or less the same.
Amazon Customer –
amazing camera! I am using this with a sigma mc-11 and sigma 18-35(EF mount) and I am super impressed! amazing quality and it is a very solid built camera that feels great 10/10 would recommended for all filmmakers!